Some strong words from the Boatrights' lawyer, Scott Tompsett:
I am astounded that the NCAA released confidential information about Ryan’s case. Ryan and his mother Tanesha cooperated fully with the NCAA with the clear understanding that the information they provided would be kept confidential and would not be released to the public. The NCAA has violated the Boatrights’ privacy by releasing their personal information.
Moreover, the NCAA’s statement contains false and misleading information. For example, the statement implies that the benefits in question were provided to influence Ryan’s decision either to attend UConn or chose an agent, if and when he goes pro. That is false and the NCAA knows it. In fact, the two individuals who provided the benefits are friends of the Boatrights. They were simply helping the family with no expectation of repayment or reciprocation. And there’s not a shred of evidence that they influenced Ryan’s decision to attend UConn or that they intend to represent Ryan if he ever goes pro. The public also should know that the NCAA never told Tanesha and Ryan who made the accusations about them or told them the substance of the accusations so they could defend themselves. Further, contrary to the NCAA’s statement, neither Tanesha nor Ryan received a car from anyone.
Until the NCAA released its statement, the Boatrights considered this matter closed. But the NCAA’s improper release of private and false information has caused the Boatrights to consider their legal options.
Thanks for adding.I appreciate this blog and the blog post also. Good one keep writing for the same.
ReplyDeleteThe community also should know that the NCAA never informed Tanesha and He who created the suggestions about them or informed them the compound of the suggestions so they could protect themselves.
ReplyDeletepedestrian accident milwaukee
Foreclosure Defense Lawyer is dedicated to protecting the rights of both consumers and businesses from illegal, abusive and predatory business practices. We help people fight back against debt collectors, credit reporting agencies, banks and predatory lenders etc.
ReplyDeleteAny private or confidential Information must not be released and if in some case it is important to release then should be used properly not like this.
ReplyDeleteSocial Security Disability Attorney
What if that private information can be used a evidence? Does that means that the said information must not be used?
ReplyDeletedisability lawyer